For thousands of years, the traditional cultures of various countries have had similar understandings of God and Creation. Legends and records about gods are common among all ethnic groups. From the gods of Taoism, to the Buddhas of Buddhism, to the God of Christianity, belief in gods is a phenomenon that spans regions, nations and cultures.
Traditional culture believes that God created humans and created civilization for humans, covering all aspects of art, medicine, architecture, etc. God not only gave man a noble source, but also formulated a set of moral codes of conduct for man. Man needs to behave in accordance with the moral standards prescribed by God.
Some modern scientific research today has shown clearly the advanced life of the universe, for example there are many accounts by people who have had near-death experiences. The exquisite harmony shown in the creation theory, as well as the various miraculous phenomena that occur among people with superpowers and cultivators, and the fact that many scientific leaders believe in God, proves that God is not a false phenomenon.
The evolutionary hypothesis is on the contrary, it fabricates a big lie that “humans evolved from monkeys” which is based on evidence that is full of loopholes. It is intended to make people no longer believe in God, no longer obey the morals and norms given by God, and leads man step by step into elimination.
This chapter will elaborate on the essential harm the theory of evolution has had and the devastating consequences it is causing to human civilization.
1.The evolution hypothesis is a big lie
1.1 The evolution hypothesis lacks scientific evidence
1.2 The system of evolution hypothesis violates the spirit of science
1.3 The evolution hypothesis cannot explain the origin of human beings
1. The Evolutionary Hypothesis is a Big Lie
The theory of evolution, in the form of a flawed and unproven hypothesis, occupies the center of the scientific palace. It is worshiped as an absolute truth, placed in an unquestionable position, and even becomes a measure of whether a research is successful and has become the scientific standard of judgment. But in fact, the evolutionary hypothesis system lacks basic scientific evidence and violates the basic scientific spirit. It is a complete lie and cannot explain the origin of human beings at all.
1.1 Lack of Scientific Evidence for Evolutionary Hypotheses
Since the emergence of the theory of evolution, scientists from all over the world have pointed out that the evolutionary hypothesis lacks scientific basis. As of April 2020, more than a thousand biologists, medical scientists, physicists, chemists, geologists, paleontologists, etc. from internationally renowned universities have publicly questioned Darwin’s theory of evolution’s explanation of the origin of life.
In 1996, American biochemist Professor Michael Beth published Darwin’s Black Box: Biochemistry’s Challenge to the Theory of Evolution , which launched a strong challenge to Darwin’s theory of evolution with irrefutable biochemical arguments.
The American “National Review” magazine listed “Darwin’s Black Box” among the 100 most important non-fiction books of the 20th century. Judge George Gilder commented : “Just as quantum theory overturned classical mechanics at the beginning of the 20th century, this book overturned Darwin at the end of the 20th century.”
In 1986, New Zealand molecular biologist Professor Michael Denton published his masterpiece Evolution: A Theory in Crisis , pointing out that Darwin’s evolutionary hypothesis is “ the biggest superstition of the 20th century .”
Thirty years later, in 2016, Professor Denton released his second masterpiece Evolution: Still A Theory in Crisis , which once again summarized many new pieces of evidence that overturned the theory of evolution.
Prof. Dr. Phillip E. Johnson (1940-2019), a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, pointed out in his book, Darwin on Trial, that “there is no science or evidence that can prove that this set of theoretical hypotheses is correct.”
A large amount of factual evidence that can overturn the theory of evolution has been listed and discussed in detail in the previous chapters.
The famous philosopher and scientist Bacon believed that the development of a theory usually requires the stages of observing phenomena, proposing hypotheses and experimental demonstrations. Measured by this scientific methodology, the theory of evolution has remained at the hypothesis stage since it was proposed and has not passed the third stage of verification. Therefore, it is not valid in scientific methodology.
At the same time, the theory of evolution refers to the phenomenon of genetic mutation between species as the concept of “microevolution” and then uses this to further amplify the conclusion of “macroevolution”. This actually violates basic logical common sense and commits overgeneralization and substitution. The conceptual error cannot be established logically.
If we judge by the experimental results of later generations, whether it is Miller’s flask experiment, Joyce’s RNA experiment or Lansky’s E. coli experiment mentioned in the previous chapter, they all directly deny the evolutionary hypothesis.
Archeology has discovered that there are no so-called “intermediate species” at all, which is a major flaw in the theory of evolution that Darwin himself admitted. Various phenomena such as reproductive isolation, failed artificial breeding, and the “living fossil” of pandas that have remained unchanged for eight million years indicate that species not only cannot evolve across species, but need to maintain their original genetic characteristics.
Humans and monkeys are completely different biological species. Not only are there significant differences in the structure and function of some key organs, such as the brain, but the proteins and genes within cells are even more different. Darwin’s far-fetched thought was that humans evolved from monkeys. In fact, even at the genetic level, it cannot be proven that human genes evolved from monkey genes. Therefore, the theory of evolution cannot be justified at all on this point.
Not only that, modern molecular biology research has further provided strong evidence to overturn the theory of evolution. The biological characteristics of genes are completely contrary to “evolution”. Most genetic mutations are harmful rather than beneficial to survival, so if life relied on genetic mutations to become new species, the result would be degeneration rather than evolution. Although evolutionists use the “survival of the fittest” hypothesis to preserve beneficial genetic mutations, because a biological species contains so many genes, the probability of creating a new species in this way is almost zero.
In the “phylogenetic tree” constructed by later generations under the influence of the theory of evolution, the “nodes” are imaginary, the “directory” is fictitious, and the “family tree generations” are messed up. It is an “imaginary tree” that cannot be erected at all. Genetic research results actually deny the evolutionary hypothesis.
All in all, there is a large amount of solid evidence in the fields of archeology, geology, and molecular biology that overturns the theory of evolution. This evidence irrefutably and powerfully reveals that the “theory of evolution” is a baseless and outright pseudoscience.
1.2 The Evolutionary Hypothesis System Violates the Spirit of Science
Darwin, who lived in the 19th century, may not have had as much biological knowledge, observation methods and techniques than that of a middle school student today. Since the emergence of the theory of evolution, evidence has continued to emerge in the scientific community that proves it wrong. Although opinions against the theory of evolution have existed for a long time, there is an invisible undercurrent that uses various methods to suppress these different voices and strives to promote the theory of evolution that has not been scientifically proven. This has led to the theory of evolution becoming the mainstream of biological sciences and gradually forming a monopoly.
With the development of science, more and more evidence (including molecular biology evidence, etc.) that can deny and overthrow the theory of evolution appears. Some of those who support the theory of evolution want to maintain the existing monopoly, and some want to fight against it. Some do not believe in God and some for personal fame and interests will use their position of scientific authority to suppress and exclude these doubts. They even turn a blind eye to real evidence, use various circular arguments or logical sophistry, and deliberately suppress those who question the theory of evolution in a very disrespectful way.
Dr. Johnson, the author of Darwin on Trial, once pointed out,
“The rules of debate set by evolutionists prevent people from questioning whether the theory of evolution is true. For example, the Academy of Sciences has set a rule of ‘no counter-evidence is allowed’. This way , no matter how many errors and omissions there are in the theory of evolution, it will not be overturned.”
Darwin’s theory of evolution is full of loopholes and is really untenable and cannot continue to deceive the world. Therefore, in order to maintain this lie and cover up the deceptive nature of the theory of evolution, many people who support the theory of evolution even distorted some views that contradicted the theory of evolution and then incorporated them into the theory of evolution system to fill in and package the loopholes and flaws in the theory of evolution.
In this way, evolutionists have created an atmosphere of consensus in the scientific community. The theory of evolution transcends all scientific rationality and has become something similar to a “religious doctrine” in the scientific world.
The basic spirit of science is to seek truth, respect facts, and allow others to question. The theory of evolution, a subjective and imaginary hypothesis with limitations of the times, has been held up in the halls of science by later generations and they are blindly worshiped.
1.3 Evolutionary Hypothesis Cannot Truly Explain the Origin of Human Beings
The theory of evolution cannot explain the magical and mysterious phenomena of life. Humans have existed on earth longer than described by the theory of evolution, are more complex in structure, and are more advanced in intelligence. The origin of man is not as simple as Darwin described.
First, the emergence of human beings is older than the theory of evolution. Numerous archaeological evidences show that before this civilization, humans still had prehistoric culture and prehistoric civilization . Prehistoric humans were able to use tools, had high skills and craftsmanship, and had highly developed intelligence and abilities that humans today do not possess.
The archaeological community’s research on fossils and prehistoric civilizations all point to the fact that human civilization far exceeds the time when humans emerged as discussed in the theory of evolution. So where did humans come from so long ago? Evolution simply cannot explain it.
Second, the theory of evolution cannot explain the exquisite complexity of the human body and the phenomena of the human soul.
The structure of the human body is very delicate and complex. In addition to our limbs and five senses, there are also more microscopic material structures such as cells and molecules, as well as the interactions between various microstructures and the precise coordination and balance mechanisms between human tissues and organs. The existence of complex structures and mechanisms cannot be explained simply by the concept of “natural selection”.
People also have spiritual attributes. Research on near-death experiences and reincarnation has proven that the human consciousness (soul) still exists independently after the death of the human body, and even continues to be reincarnated into humans or other species. These all show that the human spirit and soul are the more essential existence of human beings. Where does the human soul come from? The theory of evolution cannot explain it at all.
Third, the paranormal phenomena in the human body suggest that humans are of divine origin.
In the traditional cultivation and religious culture of various ethnic groups around the world, many practitioners at home and abroad have left miracles visible to the naked eye. For example, ancient Chinese books record that Taoist practitioners who had reached a certain level could “fly up” in the daytime; Milarepa, the elder of Tantric Buddhism, was said to “fly back” to his hometown when he completed his studies; some Tibetan Tantric practitioners appear after death.
Six special functions of the human body, including non-human eye image recognition,(the third eye),clairvoyance, remote viewing, prediction, telepathy and special actuation, have been recognized by the world. People with these special abilities can even do things that ordinary people cannot do with their eyes, hands, and feet without using their eyes, such as seeing through the human body and bending spoons with their thoughts. , bringing peanuts back to life, and more.
Scientists have discovered through experiments that there are some special functions that ordinary people can activate through training⁹²² , indicating that these functions are not mysterious, but human potential. Why are some people born with these superpowers? Evolution simply cannot explain it.
The fact of the existence of prehistoric humans, the exquisite and complex structure of the human body, the human soul, and the existence of paranormal phenomena in the human body all show that the source of human life is not simply evolved from lower-level life as described in the theory of evolution. It is very likely that it was designed and created by intelligent life that is more advanced than human beings.
Original article Source: The essence of evolution is anti-God and anti-universe [Epoch Times March 8, 2024]// https://www.epochtimes.com/gb/24/3/6/n14195994.htm
